Subject: Tags: Spam prevention:Please, enter the code that you see below in the input field. This is for blocking bots that try to post this form automatically. If the code is hard to read, then just try to guess it right. If you enter the wrong code, a new image is created and you get another chance to enter it right.Enter code: Content: Itsuki Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Fang Min,Having read over your powerpoint > I understand fully how you went about arguing > against Ganeri and why, and I completely agree > that 1) kliSTa-manas is already erroneous, 2) > self/mineness refers to AlayavijJAna (in the sense > that manas has the darzana-bhAga of Alaya as its > Alambanapratyaya), and 3) YogAcAra theory of > consciousness is not independent from its error > theory.I have one question for clarification. In > "The Target of Error Theory" you said the error > consists in people taking the stream as one > numerically identical self, while the "mineness > feeling" that occurs at each instant is itself > innocuous; the error consists in taking the > multiple "phenomenological mineness" for one > diachronically identical self. And in "Without the > afflicted-consciousness" you said there are only > experiences in the end, and both the subject > and the object aspect of experience > are an imagination caused by the afflicted > consciousness. I would like to know whether > and how the self-identity talk is related to > the subject-object division talk.Thanks!Itsuki